ar X iv : q ua nt - p h / 06 09 12 6 v 1 1 7 Se p 20 06 SU ( 2 ) Relativity and the EPR Paradox
نویسنده
چکیده
In the normal presentation of the EPR problem a comparison is made between the (weak) Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics which seems to suggest that at times action at a distance may take place, and the hidden parameter interpretation which must satisfy Bell’s inequality, in contradiction to the predictions of quantum mechanics. In this paper, we consider a relativistic approach to the paradox. However, the frame of reference under consideration is not the usual Lorenz frame but rather the spin frame of reference which is invariant with respect to the SU(2) group. Key WORDS: hidden variables, Copenhagen, SU(2) relativity
منابع مشابه
ar X iv : q ua nt - p h / 06 04 06 4 v 1 1 0 A pr 2 00 6 RELATIONAL EPR
We argue that EPR-type correlations do not entail any form of “non-locality”, when viewed in the context of a relational interpretation of quantum mechanics. The abandonment of strict Einstein realism advocated by this interpretation permits to reconcile quantum mechanics, completeness, (operationally defined) separability, and locality.
متن کاملar X iv : q ua nt - p h / 06 09 11 5 v 1 1 5 Se p 20 06 Shape invariance approach to exact solutions
Using the shape invariance property we obtain exact solutions of the (1 + 1) dimensional Klein-Gordon equation for certain types of scalar and vector potentials. We also discuss the possibility of obtaining real energy spectrum with non-Hermitian interaction within this framework.
متن کاملar X iv : q ua nt - p h / 02 06 11 6 v 1 1 8 Ju n 20 02 Five Lectures On Dissipative Master Equations
متن کامل
ar X iv : q ua nt - p h / 06 06 17 6 v 1 2 1 Ju n 20 06 On quantum positive dynamical maps
The new arguments indicating that non-completely positive maps can describe open quantum evolution are given. This work was partially supported by KBN grant PB/1490/PO3/2003/25 and SCALA (IST-2004-015714) 1
متن کاملua nt - p h / 06 06 21 8 v 1 2 6 Ju n 20 06 What is paradoxical about the “ Three - box paradox ” ?
What is paradoxical about the " Three-box paradox " ? Abstract This paper is a comment on quant-ph/0606067 by Ravon and Vaid-man, in which they defend the position that the " three-box paradox " is indeed paradoxical.
متن کامل